Divorce settlements are often presented as a straightforward calculation: add up the couple’s assets, assess their needs, and divide the available resources fairly. In practice, that process becomes considerably more complex when a trust sits somewhere in the family’s financial arrangements.
A trust may hold a family home, investments, business interests or inherited wealth. It may have been created long before the marriage, or established during the relationship for tax, succession or asset-protection reasons. The key question is not simply, “Who owns the trust assets?” It is whether the trust can provide, or is already providing, financial benefit to one or both spouses.
In England and Wales, the court has broad powers when deciding financial remedies on divorce. However, those powers do not mean every trust asset will automatically be divided between the parties.
Table of Contents
What is a trust?
A trust is a legal arrangement in which trustees hold and manage assets for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries. The person who creates the trust is usually called the settlor. The beneficiaries may have an immediate right to income or capital, or they may benefit only if trustees exercise their discretion in their favour.
That distinction matters. A beneficiary with an absolute entitlement to a trust fund is in a different position from someone who is merely one potential beneficiary among several.
Trusts commonly encountered in divorce proceedings include:
Discretionary trusts
Under a discretionary trust, trustees decide which beneficiaries receive money, when payments are made and how much is distributed. A spouse may therefore have no fixed ownership of the underlying assets, but could still receive regular payments or capital from the trust.
Fixed-interest trusts
Here, a beneficiary may have a defined right to income, capital or both. Those rights are more readily identifiable and may be treated as part of that person’s financial resources.
Family and inheritance trusts
Parents or grandparents sometimes establish trusts to preserve wealth for future generations. These arrangements may be genuinely independent of the marriage, but their treatment can depend on how they have operated in practice.
When can a trust influence the settlement?
The court’s starting point is the statutory framework in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, including the parties’ income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources. “Financial resources” can extend beyond assets legally owned by a spouse.
The court may examine whether a trust is a resource that is available, or likely to become available, to one party. It will consider the surrounding circumstances rather than relying solely on the wording of the trust deed.
For example, suppose a spouse is a beneficiary of a discretionary trust and has historically received £100,000 a year to cover living expenses. Even if the spouse cannot demand a particular sum from the trustees, the established pattern of support may be highly relevant when assessing their resources and future needs.
The court may also consider whether trustees are likely to assist following a request. Evidence could include previous distributions, the relationship between the beneficiary and trustees, the size of the fund, the beneficiary class and the purpose for which the trust was established.
Anyone dealing with these issues should understand the distinction between legal ownership, beneficial entitlement and practical access. A helpful overview of foundations and trusts in family law explains how courts may approach structures of this kind in divorce proceedings.
The importance of the trust’s history
A trust created before the marriage is not automatically excluded from consideration. Equally, a trust established during the marriage is not automatically matrimonial property.
The court may ask:
- Who created the trust, and with what intention?
- When were the assets transferred into it?
- Who contributed the money or property?
- Who are the beneficiaries?
- Have the spouses benefited from it during the marriage?
- Has the trust funded the family home, school fees, holidays or other household expenditure?
- Is the trust genuinely independent, or is it effectively controlled by one spouse?
These questions help the court assess whether the trust is a source of financial support, a protective arrangement for third parties, or an attempt to place assets beyond reach.
Trusts and the concept of “nuptial” property
Some trusts may be described as nuptial settlements. Broadly, this concerns an arrangement made with the intention of providing continuing financial benefit for a marriage or family unit.
A nuptial trust can potentially be varied by the court, although the power is technical and fact-specific. It is not enough that a trust happens to benefit a married couple. The court will examine the purpose and operation of the arrangement, including whether it was designed to provide for the spouses in their married life.
Trusts that own the family home or regularly meet household expenses may attract particular scrutiny. The court is more likely to investigate an arrangement that has functioned as part of the couple’s shared financial life than one that has remained entirely separate and has never supported them.
What if a spouse controls the trust?
Control is often more important than title. A spouse may not legally own trust assets, yet may have significant influence over the trustees or practical power to obtain funds.
The court may assess:
- Whether the spouse is a trustee or appointor.
- Whether trustees usually follow that spouse’s wishes.
- Whether the spouse can replace trustees.
- Whether the spouse has requested and received distributions.
- Whether the trust’s assets are used as though they belong personally to that spouse.
If the structure appears artificial, or if assets have been transferred into it to frustrate a financial claim, the court may take robust steps. It can scrutinise transactions, draw adverse inferences from incomplete disclosure and, in appropriate circumstances, make orders requiring action by a party who has influence over the trust.
That does not mean trustees can simply be treated as nominees. Independent trustees and genuine third-party interests are important. The court must respect the trust’s legal structure while ensuring that the overall settlement fairly reflects the parties’ available resources.
Disclosure is central
Trust disputes frequently turn on evidence. Both parties may need to obtain the trust deed, letters of wishes, accounts, tax records, distribution histories and correspondence with trustees. Information about related companies, loans and transfers may also be relevant.
A spouse who fails to disclose a beneficial interest or a history of trust payments risks damaging their credibility. In some cases, a settlement may be revisited if it was based on materially incomplete information.
Trustees should also take care. Although they are not normally parties to the divorce, they may be asked to provide documents or information. Confidentiality must be balanced against the court’s need to understand the financial picture.
Practical steps for separating couples
Anyone whose finances involve a trust should obtain advice early, before making informal arrangements or approaching trustees for distributions. Gather the relevant documents, record the history of payments and identify all people or entities connected with the structure.
Most importantly, avoid assuming that a trust is either untouchable or automatically divisible. Its treatment depends on its purpose, terms, history and relationship with the marriage. A careful, evidence-based analysis is usually more valuable than focusing on the label attached to the arrangement.
Trust structures can protect family wealth, but they can also complicate the search for a fair divorce settlement. Understanding how the court views access, control and financial need is essential to reaching a realistic outcome.